See exactly what's slowing your site down.
Drop in any URL and we'll run a full performance, accessibility, best-practice and SEO check — the same Lighthouse audit Google uses to rank you — then show you exactly what to fix.
Core Web Vitals
Lab metrics — what real users feelHow the page loads
Frame-by-frame render, captured during the auditTop opportunities
Ranked by the time we could shave off your loadDiagnostics
Audit checksWe can fix every one of these.
A report is only useful if someone acts on it. Send it to yourself and we'll include a prioritised, plain-English plan of what to tackle first, then, if you'd like, we'll do the work and get you back into the green.
- Right-sized, next-gen images — the single biggest win on most sites we audit.
- Render-blocking scripts removed so your content paints in under a second.
- Layout shift & accessibility fixes that lift you in Google and keep every visitor included.
- Clean, monitored hosting so the numbers stay green long after launch.
On its way!
Check your inbox in a minute or two for your full report and prioritised fix-it plan.
What the four scores actually mean.
The audit runs Google Lighthouse, the same engine behind PageSpeed Insights. It gives you four numbers out of 100. Here is what each one is really telling you, without the jargon.
Performance
How quickly the page becomes usable. This is the one that costs you money: people leave slow pages, and Google knows they do. Usually dragged down by oversized images, too many scripts, or no caching.
Accessibility
Whether people using a screen reader or keyboard can actually use your site. Low-contrast text, images without descriptions and unlabelled buttons are the usual culprits. It is also a legal consideration for many UK organisations.
Best practices
General web hygiene: secure connections, no console errors, no deprecated code, images at sensible dimensions. A low score here rarely breaks anything on its own, but it is a decent proxy for how well the site was built.
SEO
Whether search engines can read and understand the page. Titles, meta descriptions, crawlability, mobile friendliness. It is a technical baseline, not a ranking prediction: passing does not mean you will rank, but failing makes it harder.
So your score is red. Now what?
Not every warning is worth acting on, and chasing a perfect 100 is usually a waste of money. In roughly the order we would tackle them:
- Fix the images first. On most sites we look at, oversized and uncompressed images are the single biggest cause of a poor performance score, and the easiest thing to put right.
- Then caching. If nothing is cached, every visitor makes your server rebuild the page from scratch. Caching is usually a config change rather than a rebuild.
- Then the scripts. Every plugin, tracker and chat widget costs you speed. It is worth asking whether each one earns its place. Hungry plugins are a common culprit.
- Accessibility issues that are quick wins. Alt text, contrast and labels are cheap to fix and genuinely help real people.
- Leave the rest. Some warnings come from third-party code you cannot control. A site scoring in the 80s that loads fast for real users beats a site chasing 100 in a lab.
We are a web studio in Didcot, and we run this audit on Oxfordshire businesses' sites most weeks. If yours has thrown up something you would rather not decipher alone, send it over. We will tell you what is worth fixing and what is noise, whether or not you ever become a client.